Admittedly I thought this was going to be a book about women who were
raised in the wild (or raised by wolves, that sort of folklore) as that
is what the title and subtitle seemed to indicate. I was wrong. This
is more of a psychoanalysis book and self-help than a book on myths.
Estes
has taken a collection of myths and stories from folklore and dissected
them one by one into telling the story of the female subconscious. The
motives and actions, the restrictions society has placed on the "wild
woman" and the way that women can rediscover their wildness. She gives
little lessons and advice for those who have been brought down by
society and describes the process of suppressing a woman's instincts.
The myths themselves are told regularly and then she adds her
interpretation to the mix, showing how it relates to female psychology.
This
book is all about women. Men are mentioned but only in relation to
women. And more often than not they are the oppressors. Although there
are a few mentions of men who encourage the wildness in women. The
books total theme was one of oppression though, and I was a bit
surprised that even when she was encouraging wildness and restoring
women back to themselves, she kept referring to arts, and childbirth,
and barely a mention of science. It almost seemed like her vision of
taking the female self back was still pretty traditional. She wanted a
stronger woman, but one that could paint or write and take back her
creativity. This might not be very empowering for those women who
rather than have strong skills in the arts, are good in the sciences or
math. It just didn't seem to be all encompassing.
I liked the
myths in the book but did not enjoy how she dissected one story over and
over and over. Once would have been sufficient as I found myself
growing bored with the tedium of her repetitiveness. I think at some
points it was just an effort to make the book longer. And all of the
writing was at that level of descriptiveness. So many words to say the
same thing over and over. It made the book a bit of a slog. But,
returning back to the myths I think she chose some interesting ones, and
there were some that I had never heard before, such as the tale of Baba
Yaga and the armless girl. She had a nice variety.
I think this
book would have been immensely better if it had been edited down. It
had interesting concepts but they were lost in the sheer amount of words
and the explanations were repetitive. I just can't recommend it based
on that.
Women Who Run With the Wolves
Copyright 1992
520 pages
No comments:
Post a Comment